 Fantastic Pictures & Quality |
| Review Date: July 13, 2008 |
| Reviewer: Y. M. Daftardar, |
In fact, I have a small tale to tell before I review this camera (Kodak M1033).
I used to have Kodak EasyShare DX7590. That camera was producing gorgeous and fantastic quality pictures. I still have this camera but I wanted to buy a small camera that will fit my pocket. So I bought Sony W-170 CyberShot, but I sold it after one week because I didn't like the pictures at all. The pictures were not clear and the general quality is too low.
In that moment, I returned to the shopping mall and reviewed all the small cameras they have and after a careful consideration, I chose to buy Kodak EasyShare M1033.
Kodak EasyShare M1033 gave me the quality I want with reasonable price. I noticed that all Kodak products are delivering the same fantastic quality and sharp pictures.
Kodak M1033 has different modes that you can select depending on the situation. I used the beach mode when I went with my family and the pictures were so fantastic and the color the blue water was so nice in the pictures. Even my family couldn't believe that this camera was able to capture such pictures with that fantastic quality.
The overall experience with this camera is Fantastic and I strongly recommend it for anyone wants a small camera with high quality and resolution pictures. This camera is simple to use with its programmed modes that provide various types of pictures in different situations.
Regards,
Yousef
|
A Surprizing Find
|
| Review Date: July 30, 2008 |
| Reviewer: Bernie J. Lofaso, Austin, TX USA |
Having owned digital cameras for nearly 10 years now, I'm no weirder to them. I currently own a somewhat ancient Sony 5mp "prosumer" camera (which still takes very nice photos) and an 8mp Canon DSLR. Since the latter weighs nearly 4 lb. with my favorite lens on it and the former is not exactly compact either, I went shopping for a reasonably excellent quality and not too expensive pocket camera. After reading some reviews I was interested in a Fujifilm J10, which while inexpensive seemed pretty decent and got excellent marks for image quality. I treked down to a local Best Buy to check it out. While the J10 does look like a very nice camera for the money, I was not quite enthused about what I perceived as a sluggish response, and the camera buttons seemed a bit clunky. I chose while I was there to look around at other brands and models while I was there. That was when the Kodak M1033 caught my eye. I thought it was a very attractive looking camera. Part of this was due to the fact that it had small in it's end that would attract finger prints ... something that drives me crazy. Upon picking up the camera I then noticed it was a Kodak and was a small surprized. To be honest, I've not perceived Kodak cameras as being of particular quality or performance. Upon playing with the controls I was immediately impressed with the build quality and the feel of the buttons. Learning the joystick control ... I was off to the races. Most of the camera operation was honestly intuitive and I found the joystick a much more convinient selection method than the multi-way controls used in most pocket cameras. I was also impressed by the quick responses of the camera ... start-up time, shutter lag, magnification and image scrolling on playback were all quite excellent, particularly by pocket camera standards. I chose to wait and research the camera some more and then once I found out about the HD video modes with MPEG-4 compression, I chose to give it a try. After several days of using the camera, I'll say that overall I'm honestly impressed with it. The image quality doesn't compare with my DSLR but even though shots in low light are frequently a bit noisy and blurred (again, by DSLR standards), they look pretty excellent compared to other pocket cameras I've seen reviewed. With 10mp you can afford some blurriness which you'll never see unless you enlarge quite a bit. While full manual modes are not present on this camera, it does give some manual control and has several features that surprized me on this type of camera (spot metering and histogram to name two). On one hand the high ISO settings can make for pretty blotchy and/or noisy images, but again, I've seen far worse in camera reviews of shirt pocket cameras and I must say I'm surprized that these images seem usable even at such high settings. I'm just a bit embarrassed to admit that I've grown accustomed to shooting most of my shots in fully-automatic "dummy" mode. I can't complain about the results and should I need a small more control, to some extent I have it. All in all I'd have to give this small bugger a huge thumbs up.
|
First small camera
|
| Review Date: June 13, 2008 |
| Reviewer: Colin, Rochester, NY United States |
Small camera I bought and took on a vacation to Las Vegas and Route 66 in Arizona. I carried it in a carrier hooked to my belt. I took over 400 pictures and only 2 were discarded. (I didn't wait for the camera to focus) Very quick to turn on, and at 10 mp and a 2 gig card I had plenty of room on the card. Very sharp pictures. Very excellent pic under low light, like in casino shopping malls and at dusk. Didn't try the video part.
Charged the camera at night, no problem with battery when using the camera all day. |
HD Video in Your Pocket == Awesome
|
| Review Date: September 15, 2008 |
| Reviewer: FromPersonalExperience, Williamstown, MA USA |
| Here's my backstory: I bought a rather expensive Sony camcorder with photo capabilities thinking "this will help me chronicle my adventures while I'm in Europe." This turned out to be one of the largest mistakes I have ever made! Despite being such an expensive camcorder, the Hard Drive Disk Sony model took grainy footage and to place a sour cherry on top, the photos were terrible! I returned the piece of crap. Since the $443 camcorder had such crap quality, I thought about going all in. Let's get an HD camcorder, but we all know that requires a lot of money. Fortunately I found a much better alternative. Kodak M1033! I have reviewed footage from this Kodak camera and I it is 10x better than the Sony camcorder that I had. It features 720HD video capabilities and I must say this is an incredible deal. It really beats an upscale Sony camcorder AND it takes fantastic pictures. Certainly worth it if you're into making decent home movies. If you just want a solid digital camera, you can score with a canon powershot which sells at a price a small cheaper than this. HD video in your pocket can't be beat! |
I like it
|
| Review Date: June 26, 2008 |
| Reviewer: Mar, |
I had lots of cameras.
I just returned to Panasonic Fs20 i did not like .
But this camera i just got today i did pics of the kids and its quick !! of 50 pics maybe 2 came out blurry.
So im pleased -its small -3 inch lcd.
colorful
very sharp nice pics.
i was going to get the silver one but i finished up with the black one because it was much cheaper then silver
so who cares about the color!
For this price 10 mp i do recommed this camera to everybody.
its was nice sold it. i will give a 4 star not a 5 like did because the camera is very slow also night shots are poor. but everything else is fantastic. |
Fantastic price for fantastic pictures
|
| Review Date: September 23, 2008 |
| Reviewer: JJackson, Pensacola, Fl United States |
| Simple to use, share and print! This camera is user friendly and takes fantastic pictures. Lots of scenes to select from to get the right amount of light-zooms quick and close. I did hours of research on the the internet and in local electronic stores and tested several models including Nikon (Coolpix) and Sony (CyberShot) and everytime, this camera was more bang for the buck. Like it. You will not be disappointed-after all Kodak IS photos! |
|
December 8th, 2009 | 
Author: 
No video reviews found for this product.
Posted in 
Tags: 
